Usedge
CX Teams

The why behind every CX score.

NPS, CSAT, and CES tell you the score moved. Usedge tells you why — by unifying your quantitative CX metrics with qualitative research, clustering feedback at volume, and routing findings to the teams who can act.

GDPR compliant AI-powered analysis
app.usedge.com / cx / nps-deep-dive

NPS Score

+42

Net Promoter Score

DetractorsPassivesPromoters

4.2

CSAT /5

3.1

CES (low=good)

Theme clusters · why

Mobile checkout flow 487

38% of feedback

Support response time 346

27% of feedback

Onboarding experience 243

19% of feedback

2,103 verbatims analysedScore-to-Reason linked

89%

Feedback triaged

2.1 days

Avg loop-close time

Trusted by enterprises that can't afford research slop

France Télévisions
Pluxee
IDEMIA
ONEM RVA
Unowhy
France Travail
Syensqo
Dedalus
Edusign
Europ Assistance
C Possible
5th Floor

The problems CX teams live with

A score is not an insight

CX teams own the metrics that matter most to the business — and rarely have the tools to explain them.

Scores tell you nothing about the why

NPS moved ‑8 points. The dashboard confirms it. But nothing in your CX stack explains what drove it — surveys lack depth, open-ends go unread.

Feedback is scattered across every channel

Zendesk tickets, app store reviews, NPS verbatims, Intercom threads, support calls — signal drowns in volume with no unified view.

Closing the loop takes weeks

By the time an insight reaches the team that can act, the window to fix it has passed. Routing is manual, slow, and depends on the right person seeing the right report.

Over-reliance on a single metric

Boardrooms live on NPS, but NPS misses friction, effort, and sentiment. Richer triangulated evidence requires stitching tools that were never designed to connect.

CX improvements can't be tied to revenue

Leadership needs more than "customers are happier." Connecting a friction reduction to retention or expansion revenue is hard when quant and qual live separately.

Metrics that matter

Beyond NPS — triangulated CX evidence

Usedge adds the qualitative why to quantitative scores and routes it to action. Move from a single number to a complete picture.

NPS

0
+11 after fixes

Triangulated with qualitative why

CSAT

0.0/5
+0.4 pts

Satisfaction tracked per journey

CES (effort)

0.0
−0.6 pts

Lower is better — friction reduced

Avg loop-close time

0.0 d
from 12 days

Insight → team action

Feedback triaged

0%
auto-clustered

Verbatims routed to a theme

Themes identified

0
this quarter

Open-text clusters, AI-generated

How Usedge helps

From feedback collected to action taken

Usedge replaces the loop of export → spreadsheet → deck → meeting with a continuous, AI-assisted pipeline from signal to fix.

Scores get their reason

Link every NPS, CSAT, and CES measurement to the qualitative evidence that explains it. Combine a survey with follow-up interviews or open-text verbatims — all unified in one repository.

All channels. One view.

Import CSV exports from any feedback tool. Connect Zendesk, Intercom, and CRM sources via integrations. Every signal — ticket, review, survey response — lands in the same indexed repository.

Themes at scale, instantly

AI Research Agents cluster thousands of open-text verbatims into ranked themes with sentiment in seconds. What used to take a week of manual tagging runs automatically after every collection cycle.

Insight routed to action

The Loop-Closer agent packages each finding — score + driver + evidence — and routes it to the right team. Journey owners receive actionable context, not raw data, closing the loop faster.

Infrastructure layer

Multi-channel feedback → unified repository → action

Usedge acts as the operating layer that consolidates every CX signal, makes sense of it with AI agents, and routes findings to the teams who own the journey.

Feedback sources

CX surveys

NPS, CSAT, CES, open-text verbatims

CSV imports

Ticket exports, analytics, CRM snapshots

Integrations

Zendesk, Intercom, HubSpot, Salesforce

Insights Repository

Quant score + qual reason, unified and AI-queryable

Verbatims auto-tagged
Score ↔ evidence linked
Journey indexed

Actionable outputs

Theme clusters

Open-text → ranked themes + sentiment

Score-to-reason links

NPS/CSAT driver identified from evidence

Routed to journey owners

Finding packaged and sent to the right team

Connect your existing CX stack

Research & productivity
NotionApp FollowDovetailAirtableConfluenceMiroLinearJiraGoogle DriveDropbox
AI models & agents
ClaudeChatGPTMistralGeminiCursorCopilotPerplexity
CRM & sales
HubSpotSalesforceAttioPipedriveGongIntercomZendesk
Design & product
FigmaMazeZeplinStorybookWebflowFramer
Communication
SlackTeamsZoomLoomDiscordAsanaMonday

Research agents

AI agents built for CX workflows

Chain agents from verbatim collection to insight routing, or run them independently on any dataset in your repository.

Agentic pipeline — NPS driver analysis

Step 1

Verbatim Theme Clusterer

Ingests thousands of open-text survey responses and support verbatims. Outputs ranked themes with volume, sentiment, and representative quotes — automatically.

Step 2

Score-to-Reason Linker

Takes the Theme Clusterer output and correlates theme prevalence with NPS/CSAT movements. Identifies which themes statistically drove the score change.

Step 3

Loop-Closer / Routing Assistant

Packages the score + driver + evidence into a brief and routes it to the journey owner or product team. Includes a recommended action and priority level.

Standalone agent

Journey analysis

Journey Friction Analyzer

Maps a specific customer journey (e.g. onboarding, checkout, renewal) against research and feedback signals to pinpoint where customers drop off, struggle, or churn. Outputs a prioritised friction map.

Why Usedge

More than a dashboard that tracks a score

NPS platforms show you where you are. Usedge shows you why you got there — and what to do about it.

CapabilityUsedgeNPS / survey tools
Quant score + qualitative why, unified
NPS dashboards stop at the number
Agentic theme clustering at volume
Manual tagging or keyword search
Multi-channel feedback consolidated
One source; no cross-tool unification
Insight routed to the right team
Manual sharing; no routing logic
EU-hosted, GDPR-compliant
US-based infrastructure
Quant + qual chained into one workflow
Separate survey and insights tools

Example scenario

"NPS dipped after a release"

From alert to fix — an end-to-end walkthrough of how Usedge turns a score movement into a closed loop.

Usedge · Trigger

Trigger

NPS drops 8 points after v2.4 release

Dashboard alert: NPS slips from +50 to +42. 1,247 new Zendesk tickets and 856 survey verbatims have come in over the past two weeks.

Before

+50

NPS

−8

After

+42

NPS

Collect, connect, close the loop

Three steps from feedback collected to action taken.

Step 1

Collect from all channels

Run CX surveys (NPS, CSAT, CES) and import feedback from Zendesk, Intercom, CSV exports, or any connected integration. Every signal lands in one repository — no manual aggregation.

Step 2

Cluster and connect

AI agents cluster open-text verbatims into themes, link each theme to its score driver, and correlate quantitative movements with qualitative evidence. The why is always visible next to the what.

Step 3

Route to action

The Loop-Closer agent packages each finding — score, driver, evidence, recommended action — and routes it to the journey owner. The loop closes in days, not weeks.

Turn your CX scores into decisions

See how CX teams use Usedge to close the loop from feedback to fix — without switching between five different tools.