Usedge
Product Teams

Evidence at the speed of product.

PMs and product designers need answers before the sprint ends, not after. Usedge gives teams validated protocol templates, instant AI analysis, and quant+qual in one place, so decisions are grounded in evidence, not shipped on gut.

GDPR compliant AI-powered analysis
app.usedge.com/decisions

Checkout conversion funnel

Product page
100%
Add to cart
73%
Checkout
44%−8%
Payment
38%
Confirm
35%
Why: Friction Finder

Order total hidden until payment screen: 63% of testers stopped here

Unmoderated · 200 participantsHigh 89%
8%
Drop detected
1d
To insight

Trusted by enterprises that can't afford research slop

France Télévisions
Pluxee
IDEMIA
ONEM RVA
Unowhy
France Travail
Syensqo
Dedalus
Edusign
Europ Assistance
C Possible
5th Floor

Why product teams ship on gut

Not because they want to. Because the alternative (waiting weeks for research) is incompatible with how product teams actually work.

Cycles accelerate; research can't keep up

Product ships on two-week sprints. Traditional research takes four to six weeks. So teams default to gut instinct, competitive benchmarks, and one-pager assumptions, finding out they were wrong after launch.

Research is a bottleneck owned by one team

PMs and designers can't self-serve safely. Every question goes through the research team. The research team is at capacity. By the time an answer arrives, the decision has already been made.

Roadmap decisions aren't traceable to evidence

Asked to justify a prioritization call, most PMs point to a Confluence page that cites a slide that summarized a study nobody can find. There is no chain from claim to evidence.

Quant tells you what dropped; no one has time to find why

Analytics shows checkout conversion fell 8%. That's the signal, not the diagnosis. Getting from metric to root cause requires a research cycle most product teams can't afford mid-sprint.

Democratizing research creates quality risk

When PMs run their own studies without guardrails, methodology suffers. Leading questions, biased participant pools, and unreplicable designs produce findings teams can't defend to stakeholders.

The metrics that move when teams have evidence

Evidence-led product decisions compound: faster cycles, higher adoption, fewer rework sprints.

Time to insight

0 day
from 14 days

Unmoderated test → AI-analyzed findings, same week

Feature adoption lift

0%
avg. after evidence-led design

Features shaped by validated research vs. gut calls

Roadmap decisions backed

0%
from 22% baseline

Traceable from claim to study to participant

Task success rate

0pp
pre / post-ship improvement

Usability fixes validated before and after release

Team velocity gain

0%
fewer rework cycles

Evidence upfront prevents costly post-launch pivots

Churn reduction

0%
from UX-driven fixes

Retention insights surfaced from qual + quant signals

How Usedge helps

Research that moves at product speed

Four capabilities that turn weeks-long research cycles into same-week validated decisions, without sacrificing the rigor that makes them worth acting on.

Self-serve tests at speed

Unmoderated tests at scale overnight and quick moderated sessions for depth, without waiting for a researcher slot. PMs run the study; the guardrails handle the rigor.

Validated protocol templates

Pre-built, methodology-scored templates so PMs and designers run rigorous studies without a methodology background. Questions are structured, biases are minimized, findings are defensible.

Instant AI analysis

Sessions analyzed automatically: highlights extracted, themes clustered, insights drafted within minutes of a study closing. From 200 participants to a ranked finding list before end of day.

Quant and qual in one place

Connect analytics drops, NPS dips, or funnel metrics to qualitative evidence in the same platform. Stop emailing two teams and triangulating in a spreadsheet.

Research OS

The infrastructure layer for evidence-led product teams

Four connected layers that take a product question from protocol to decision, and push the insight wherever the decision is made.

Protocol Builder

Validated templates with methodology scoring, so PMs run rigorous studies without a research background. Guardrails prevent leading questions and biased designs.

Learn more →

Studies at scale

Unmoderated tests to 200+ participants overnight. Moderated sessions for depth. Qual and quant captured in the same workspace, no exports, no imports.

Learn more →

Insights Repository

Every finding stored as an atomic insight with traceable evidence. Roadmap decisions link directly to the studies that support them, defensible in any review.

Learn more →

Research Agents

Instant synthesis: Friction Finder, Why-Behind-the-What, Decision Brief Writer. Chain agents together from a usability test to a stakeholder-ready recommendation in minutes.

Learn more →

Insights flow into the tools PMs already use

Research & productivity
NotionAirtableConfluenceLinearJira
AI models & agents
ClaudeChatGPTMistralGeminiCursorCopilotPerplexity
CRM & sales
HubSpotIntercom
Design & product
FigmaMaze
Communication
SlackTeamsAsanaMonday

Connect Jira, Linear, Notion, Slack, and Figma so findings land where the roadmap lives, without anyone copying a summary into another tool.

Research Agents

Agents built for how product teams work

Each agent handles one product research task end-to-end. Chain them together: Friction Finder surfaces the issue; Decision Brief Writer turns it into a stakeholder recommendation in minutes.

Friction Finder

Surfaces the top friction points in any usability test, ranked by severity.

Analyzes an unmoderated session set and identifies where participants stopped, struggled, or dropped off. Returns a ranked list of friction points with supporting clips and a severity score, ready to paste into a sprint doc.

Output

Ranked friction list · Severity scores · Linked session clips

Why-Behind-the-What

Connects a quantitative metric drop to qualitative root cause.

Feed it a funnel step, an NPS drop, or an analytics anomaly alongside your qualitative studies. The agent correlates the signal with qualitative evidence and returns the most likely cause, with confidence and citation.

Output

Root cause + confidence · Qual evidence citations · Quant correlation

Decision Brief Writer

Turns a study into a one-page, stakeholder-ready recommendation.

Takes a completed study or finding set and generates a structured decision brief: context, evidence, recommendation, and open questions. Stored in the repository, linked to the study, ready to share or attach to a Jira ticket.

Output

Structured brief · Evidence links · Stakeholder-ready format

Protocol Evaluator

Guardrail for PM-run studies: checks methodology before a study goes live.

Reviews your draft research questions and study design against established methodology criteria. Flags leading questions, insufficient criteria, and design gaps, so the data you collect is worth trusting.

Output

Methodology score · Specific improvements · Pass / review status

Chain them: Friction Finder → Why-Behind-the-What → Decision Brief Writer. One study, one stakeholder doc, zero manual steps.
All research agents →

Why Usedge, not the other tools PMs already have

Survey tools give speed without depth. Transcript tools give depth without guardrails. Analytics give signal without diagnosis. Usedge gives all four.

Without Usedge
With Usedge
Survey tools: fast but qual-only. No usability context, no traceability.
Usedge: unmoderated tests, moderated sessions, qual and quant in one platform.
Transcript tools: analysis, no guardrails. PM-run studies lose rigor.
Usedge: methodology-scored templates and a Protocol Evaluator agent prevent bad study design before data is collected.
AI summarizers: fast insights, no sources. You can't defend what you can't trace.
Usedge: every AI-generated insight links to the highlight, session, and participant. Full audit trail.
Research stays in Dovetail. Roadmap lives in Jira. They never sync.
Usedge pushes findings into Jira, Linear, Notion, and Slack automatically. Insights land where decisions happen.

Speed and rigor: not a tradeoff

Validated protocol templates and the Protocol Evaluator agent mean non-researchers can run studies without sacrificing methodology quality.

Quant and qual, unified

Connect a funnel drop to a qualitative root cause in the same platform. No more forwarding analytics screenshots to the research team.

Agentic synthesis in minutes

Friction Finder, Why-Behind-the-What, and Decision Brief Writer turn a raw study into a stakeholder recommendation, automatically.

Insights where decisions are made

Findings pushed to Jira, Linear, Notion, and Slack. The PM sees the evidence in the tool they're already in.

Example scenario

Checkout conversion dropped 8%. Root cause confirmed by morning.

Trigger

Checkout conversion drops 8%

Analytics dashboard shows a sustained 8% drop at the checkout step over the past 10 days. No recent deployment explains it. The PM needs to understand why before the next sprint planning.

Checkout conversion

48%

Before

40%

After

−8%

From question to evidence in three steps

One workflow whether you need depth or scale, with a stakeholder-ready output at the end.

Step 1

Pick a template and launch

Choose from validated protocol templates: checkout flow, feature validation, onboarding friction, and concept tests. The Protocol Evaluator checks your study before it goes live. Launch unmoderated to 200 participants or schedule a moderated session.

Step 2

AI analyzes while you sleep

Sessions close; analysis runs automatically. Friction Finder and Why-Behind-the-What identify top issues, correlate with your quant signals, and draft atomic insights, each linked to the highlights that support them.

Step 3

Decision Brief, ready to act on

Decision Brief Writer generates a one-page stakeholder recommendation from the findings. It lands in the Insights Repository, links to your Jira ticket, and can be shared in Slack before the next sprint planning call.

Evidence at the speed of product

Ship decisions backed by traceable evidence, not gut. Validated templates, instant AI analysis, and quant+qual in one place.